mirror of https://github.com/harness/drone.git
561 lines
14 KiB
Go
561 lines
14 KiB
Go
// Copyright 2023 Harness, Inc.
|
|
//
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
package protection
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/harness/gitness/app/services/codeowners"
|
|
"github.com/harness/gitness/types"
|
|
"github.com/harness/gitness/types/enum"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// nolint:gocognit // it's a unit test
|
|
func TestBranch_MergeVerify(t *testing.T) {
|
|
user := &types.Principal{ID: 42}
|
|
admin := &types.Principal{ID: 66, Admin: true}
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
branch Branch
|
|
in MergeVerifyInput
|
|
expOut MergeVerifyOutput
|
|
expVs []types.RuleViolations
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "empty",
|
|
branch: Branch{},
|
|
in: MergeVerifyInput{Actor: user},
|
|
expOut: MergeVerifyOutput{
|
|
DeleteSourceBranch: false,
|
|
AllowedMethods: enum.MergeMethods,
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "admin-no-owner",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{},
|
|
PullReq: DefPullReq{
|
|
StatusChecks: DefStatusChecks{RequireIdentifiers: []string{"abc"}},
|
|
Comments: DefComments{RequireResolveAll: true},
|
|
Merge: DefMerge{DeleteBranch: true},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
in: MergeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: admin,
|
|
IsRepoOwner: false,
|
|
AllowBypass: true,
|
|
PullReq: &types.PullReq{UnresolvedCount: 1},
|
|
},
|
|
expOut: MergeVerifyOutput{
|
|
DeleteSourceBranch: true,
|
|
AllowedMethods: enum.MergeMethods,
|
|
RequiresCommentResolution: true,
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{
|
|
{
|
|
Bypassable: false,
|
|
Bypassed: false,
|
|
Violations: []types.Violation{
|
|
{Code: codePullReqCommentsReqResolveAll},
|
|
{Code: codePullReqStatusChecksReqIdentifiers},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "user-bypass",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{UserIDs: []int64{user.ID}},
|
|
PullReq: DefPullReq{
|
|
StatusChecks: DefStatusChecks{RequireIdentifiers: []string{"abc"}},
|
|
Comments: DefComments{RequireResolveAll: true},
|
|
Merge: DefMerge{DeleteBranch: true},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
in: MergeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: user,
|
|
AllowBypass: true,
|
|
PullReq: &types.PullReq{UnresolvedCount: 1},
|
|
},
|
|
expOut: MergeVerifyOutput{
|
|
DeleteSourceBranch: true,
|
|
AllowedMethods: enum.MergeMethods,
|
|
RequiresCommentResolution: true,
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{
|
|
{
|
|
Bypassable: true,
|
|
Bypassed: true,
|
|
Violations: []types.Violation{
|
|
{Code: codePullReqCommentsReqResolveAll},
|
|
{Code: codePullReqStatusChecksReqIdentifiers},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "user-no-bypass",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
PullReq: DefPullReq{
|
|
StatusChecks: DefStatusChecks{RequireIdentifiers: []string{"abc"}},
|
|
Comments: DefComments{RequireResolveAll: true},
|
|
Merge: DefMerge{DeleteBranch: true},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
in: MergeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: user,
|
|
AllowBypass: true,
|
|
PullReq: &types.PullReq{UnresolvedCount: 1},
|
|
},
|
|
expOut: MergeVerifyOutput{
|
|
DeleteSourceBranch: true,
|
|
AllowedMethods: enum.MergeMethods,
|
|
RequiresCommentResolution: true,
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{
|
|
{
|
|
Bypassable: false,
|
|
Bypassed: false,
|
|
Violations: []types.Violation{
|
|
{Code: codePullReqCommentsReqResolveAll},
|
|
{Code: codePullReqStatusChecksReqIdentifiers},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "merge-methods",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{},
|
|
PullReq: DefPullReq{
|
|
StatusChecks: DefStatusChecks{},
|
|
Comments: DefComments{},
|
|
Merge: DefMerge{
|
|
StrategiesAllowed: []enum.MergeMethod{enum.MergeMethodRebase, enum.MergeMethodSquash},
|
|
DeleteBranch: false,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
in: MergeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: user,
|
|
},
|
|
expOut: MergeVerifyOutput{
|
|
DeleteSourceBranch: false,
|
|
AllowedMethods: []enum.MergeMethod{enum.MergeMethodRebase, enum.MergeMethodSquash},
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "verify-output",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{},
|
|
PullReq: DefPullReq{
|
|
StatusChecks: DefStatusChecks{},
|
|
Comments: DefComments{
|
|
RequireResolveAll: true,
|
|
},
|
|
Approvals: DefApprovals{
|
|
RequireCodeOwners: true,
|
|
RequireMinimumCount: 2,
|
|
RequireNoChangeRequest: true,
|
|
},
|
|
Merge: DefMerge{
|
|
DeleteBranch: true,
|
|
StrategiesAllowed: []enum.MergeMethod{enum.MergeMethodSquash},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
in: MergeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: user,
|
|
ResolveUserGroupID: mockUserGroupResolver,
|
|
CodeOwners: &codeowners.Evaluation{},
|
|
PullReq: &types.PullReq{},
|
|
Reviewers: []*types.PullReqReviewer{},
|
|
},
|
|
expOut: MergeVerifyOutput{
|
|
DeleteSourceBranch: true,
|
|
AllowedMethods: []enum.MergeMethod{enum.MergeMethodSquash},
|
|
RequiresCodeOwnersApproval: true,
|
|
RequiresNoChangeRequests: true,
|
|
RequiresCommentResolution: true,
|
|
MinimumRequiredApprovalsCount: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{
|
|
{
|
|
Violations: []types.Violation{
|
|
{Code: codePullReqApprovalReqMinCount},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "verify-output-latest",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{},
|
|
PullReq: DefPullReq{
|
|
StatusChecks: DefStatusChecks{},
|
|
Comments: DefComments{},
|
|
Approvals: DefApprovals{
|
|
RequireCodeOwners: true,
|
|
RequireMinimumCount: 2,
|
|
RequireNoChangeRequest: true,
|
|
RequireLatestCommit: true,
|
|
},
|
|
Merge: DefMerge{},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
in: MergeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: user,
|
|
CodeOwners: &codeowners.Evaluation{},
|
|
PullReq: &types.PullReq{},
|
|
Reviewers: []*types.PullReqReviewer{},
|
|
},
|
|
expOut: MergeVerifyOutput{
|
|
AllowedMethods: []enum.MergeMethod{
|
|
enum.MergeMethodFastForward,
|
|
enum.MergeMethodMerge,
|
|
enum.MergeMethodRebase,
|
|
enum.MergeMethodSquash,
|
|
},
|
|
RequiresCodeOwnersApprovalLatest: true,
|
|
RequiresNoChangeRequests: true,
|
|
MinimumRequiredApprovalsCountLatest: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{
|
|
{
|
|
Violations: []types.Violation{
|
|
{Code: codePullReqApprovalReqMinCountLatest},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if err := test.branch.Sanitize(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("invalid: %s", err.Error())
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
out, results, err := test.branch.MergeVerify(ctx, test.in)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("error: %s", err.Error())
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if want, got := test.expOut, out; !reflect.DeepEqual(want, got) {
|
|
t.Errorf("output: want=%+v got=%+v", want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if want, got := len(test.expVs), len(results); want != got {
|
|
t.Errorf("number of violations mismatch: want=%d got=%d", want, got)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i := range results {
|
|
if want, got := test.expVs[i].Bypassable, results[i].Bypassable; want != got {
|
|
t.Errorf("rule result %d, bypassable mismatch: want=%t got=%t", i, want, got)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if want, got := test.expVs[i].Bypassed, results[i].Bypassed; want != got {
|
|
t.Errorf("rule result %d, bypassed mismatch: want=%t got=%t", i, want, got)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if want, got := len(test.expVs[i].Violations), len(results[i].Violations); want != got {
|
|
t.Errorf("rule result %d, violations count mismatch: want=%d got=%d", i, want, got)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for j := range results[i].Violations {
|
|
if want, got := test.expVs[i].Violations[j].Code, results[i].Violations[j].Code; want != got {
|
|
t.Errorf("rule result %d, violation %d, code mismatch: want=%s got=%s", i, j, want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestBranch_RequiredChecks(t *testing.T) {
|
|
user := &types.Principal{ID: 42}
|
|
admin := &types.Principal{ID: 66, Admin: true}
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
branch Branch
|
|
in RequiredChecksInput
|
|
expOut RequiredChecksOutput
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "empty",
|
|
branch: Branch{},
|
|
in: RequiredChecksInput{Actor: user},
|
|
expOut: RequiredChecksOutput{
|
|
RequiredIdentifiers: nil,
|
|
BypassableIdentifiers: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "admin-no-owner",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{},
|
|
PullReq: DefPullReq{
|
|
StatusChecks: DefStatusChecks{RequireIdentifiers: []string{"abc"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
in: RequiredChecksInput{
|
|
Actor: admin,
|
|
IsRepoOwner: false,
|
|
},
|
|
expOut: RequiredChecksOutput{
|
|
RequiredIdentifiers: map[string]struct{}{"abc": {}},
|
|
BypassableIdentifiers: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "user-bypass",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{UserIDs: []int64{user.ID}},
|
|
PullReq: DefPullReq{
|
|
StatusChecks: DefStatusChecks{RequireIdentifiers: []string{"abc"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
in: RequiredChecksInput{
|
|
Actor: user,
|
|
},
|
|
expOut: RequiredChecksOutput{
|
|
RequiredIdentifiers: nil,
|
|
BypassableIdentifiers: map[string]struct{}{"abc": {}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "user-no-bypass",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
PullReq: DefPullReq{
|
|
StatusChecks: DefStatusChecks{RequireIdentifiers: []string{"abc"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
in: RequiredChecksInput{
|
|
Actor: user,
|
|
},
|
|
expOut: RequiredChecksOutput{
|
|
RequiredIdentifiers: map[string]struct{}{"abc": {}},
|
|
BypassableIdentifiers: nil,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if err := test.branch.Sanitize(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("invalid: %s", err.Error())
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
out, err := test.branch.RequiredChecks(ctx, test.in)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("error: %s", err.Error())
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if want, got := test.expOut, out; !reflect.DeepEqual(want, got) {
|
|
t.Errorf("output: want=%+v got=%+v", want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// nolint:gocognit // it's a unit test
|
|
func TestBranch_RefChangeVerify(t *testing.T) {
|
|
user := &types.Principal{ID: 42}
|
|
admin := &types.Principal{ID: 66, Admin: true}
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
branch Branch
|
|
in RefChangeVerifyInput
|
|
expVs []types.RuleViolations
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "empty",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{},
|
|
Lifecycle: DefLifecycle{},
|
|
},
|
|
in: RefChangeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: user,
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "admin-no-owner",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{},
|
|
Lifecycle: DefLifecycle{DeleteForbidden: true},
|
|
},
|
|
in: RefChangeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: admin,
|
|
IsRepoOwner: false,
|
|
AllowBypass: true,
|
|
RefAction: RefActionDelete,
|
|
RefType: RefTypeBranch,
|
|
RefNames: []string{"abc"},
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{
|
|
{
|
|
Bypassable: false,
|
|
Bypassed: false,
|
|
Violations: []types.Violation{
|
|
{Code: codeLifecycleDelete},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "owner-bypass",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{RepoOwners: true},
|
|
Lifecycle: DefLifecycle{DeleteForbidden: true},
|
|
},
|
|
in: RefChangeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: user,
|
|
AllowBypass: true,
|
|
IsRepoOwner: true,
|
|
RefAction: RefActionDelete,
|
|
RefType: RefTypeBranch,
|
|
RefNames: []string{"abc"},
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{
|
|
{
|
|
Bypassable: true,
|
|
Bypassed: true,
|
|
Violations: []types.Violation{
|
|
{Code: codeLifecycleDelete},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "user-no-bypass",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{RepoOwners: true},
|
|
Lifecycle: DefLifecycle{DeleteForbidden: true},
|
|
},
|
|
in: RefChangeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: user,
|
|
AllowBypass: true,
|
|
IsRepoOwner: false,
|
|
RefAction: RefActionDelete,
|
|
RefType: RefTypeBranch,
|
|
RefNames: []string{"abc"},
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{
|
|
{
|
|
Bypassable: false,
|
|
Bypassed: false,
|
|
Violations: []types.Violation{
|
|
{Code: codeLifecycleDelete},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "usergroup-bypass",
|
|
branch: Branch{
|
|
Bypass: DefBypass{RepoOwners: true},
|
|
Lifecycle: DefLifecycle{DeleteForbidden: true},
|
|
},
|
|
in: RefChangeVerifyInput{
|
|
Actor: &types.Principal{ID: 43},
|
|
ResolveUserGroupID: mockUserGroupResolver,
|
|
AllowBypass: true,
|
|
IsRepoOwner: false,
|
|
RefAction: RefActionDelete,
|
|
RefType: RefTypeBranch,
|
|
RefNames: []string{"abc"},
|
|
},
|
|
expVs: []types.RuleViolations{
|
|
{
|
|
Bypassable: true,
|
|
Bypassed: true,
|
|
Violations: []types.Violation{
|
|
{Code: codeLifecycleDelete},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ctx := context.Background()
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if err := test.branch.Sanitize(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("invalid: %s", err.Error())
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
results, err := test.branch.RefChangeVerify(ctx, test.in)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("error: %s", err.Error())
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if want, got := len(test.expVs), len(results); want != got {
|
|
t.Errorf("number of violations mismatch: want=%d got=%d", want, got)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i := range results {
|
|
if want, got := test.expVs[i].Bypassable, results[i].Bypassable; want != got {
|
|
t.Errorf("rule result %d, bypassable mismatch: want=%t got=%t", i, want, got)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if want, got := test.expVs[i].Bypassed, results[i].Bypassed; want != got {
|
|
t.Errorf("rule result %d, bypassed mismatch: want=%t got=%t", i, want, got)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if want, got := len(test.expVs[i].Violations), len(results[i].Violations); want != got {
|
|
t.Errorf("rule result %d, violations count mismatch: want=%d got=%d", i, want, got)
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for j := range results[i].Violations {
|
|
if want, got := test.expVs[i].Violations[j].Code, results[i].Violations[j].Code; want != got {
|
|
t.Errorf("rule result %d, violation %d, code mismatch: want=%s got=%s", i, j, want, got)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func mockUserGroupResolver(_ context.Context, _ []int64) ([]int64, error) {
|
|
return []int64{43}, nil
|
|
}
|