ksql/benchmarks
Vinícius Garcia be9f686a9a Update benchmarks to test ksql on its most common use-case
Before this commit we were not benchmarking ksql with the
"omit-select" feature.

This could lead people to say that this feature is actually
expensive, but it really isn't so I just updated the benchmarks
to always run with this feature.

Before doing this change I actually put both features together
on the benchmark to compare them and these are the results:

```
ksql/sql-adapter/single-row-12               17186   143286 ns/op
ksql/sql-adapter-with-omit/single-row-12     16502   142893 ns/op

ksql/sql-adapter/multiple-rows-12            15361   153890 ns/op
ksql/sql-adapter-with-omit/multiple-rows-12  15360   156075 ns/op

ksql/pgx-adapter/single-row-12               33894    68332 ns/op
ksql/pgx-adapter-with-omit/single-row-12     34563    68861 ns/op

ksql/pgx-adapter/multiple-rows-12            29677    79196 ns/op
ksql/pgx-adapter-with-omit/multiple-rows-12  28934    80422 ns/op
```

Please note that benchmarks usually run slighly slower or faster
on each attempt, so small differences like the ones presented
above are really hard to interpret.
2022-05-31 09:19:24 -03:00
..
2022-03-15 19:55:08 -03:00
2022-03-15 19:41:34 -03:00